By Lambert Strether of Corrente.
Bird Song of the Day
Southern Scrub-Robin, Little Desert Nature Lodge, Hindmarsh, Victoria, Australia.
In Case You Might Miss…
(1) Stormy Daniels takes the stand, Molineux Rule issues notwithstanding.
(2) Vaccine hesitancy and trust in institutions.
(3) Why have kids stopped reading?
Politics
“So many of the social reactions that strike us as psychological are in fact a rational management of symbolic capital.” –Pierre Bourdieu, Classification Struggles
2024
Less than a year to go!
RCP Poll Averages, May 3:
National results now moving Trump’s way. But some of the Swing States (more here) are now moving Biden’s way, including Michigan and Wisconsin, which is no doubt why Trump visited them on his day off. Pennsylvania, OTOH, just leaned to Trump. Of course, it goes without saying that these are all state polls, therefore bad. Now, if either candidate starts breaking in points, instead of tenths of a point….
Trump (R) (Bragg/Merchan): “Testifying in hush money trial, porn actor Stormy Daniels describes first meeting Trump” [Associated Press]. “Jurors appeared riveted as Daniels described how an initial meeting at a golf tournament, where they discussed the adult film industry, progressed to a ‘brief’ sexual encounter that she said Trump initiated after inviting her to dinner and back to his hotel suite. After it ended, she said, ‘It was really hard to get my shoes because my hands were shaking so hard,’ she testified. “He said, ‘Oh, it was great. Let’s get together again, honey bunch,’” Daniels continued. ‘I just wanted to leave.’” • “Honey bunch”?! Trump, from Queens, said that? “I’ll take ‘Things That Never Happened for $500, Alex.” (To be fair, the phrase is in Daniel’s book, as of 2018, but I don’t care; the piss-bed episode in the Steele Dossier is more plausible than “honey bunch.” Tapes, or it didn’t happen.)
Trump (R) (Bragg/Merchan): “Stormy Daniels on the stand details Trump hush money agreement: Live updates” [The Hill]. “Daniels is recalling when she spanked Trump with a rolled up magazine before they allegedly had sex at their hotel encounter in 2006. She testified that Trump would ask her questions only to cut her off and talk more about himself. ‘I had had enough of his arrogance and cutting me off and him not giving me dinner,’ Daniels said. Prosecutor Susan Hoffinger later asked, ‘Where did you swat him?’ ‘Right on the butt,’ Daniels responded.” • Cue the liberalgasm. No projection here! (Indeed, one might urge that the same sort of mind that invented the episodes in the Steele Dossier invented “honey bunch” — an excellent brainworm, I confess; soon it will be all over everything — and the rolled up newspaper, too, the handwriting connecting all three being infantilization, a pervasive liberal Democrat trope).
Trump (R) (Bragg/Merchan): “Jurors in Trump Trial Hear Witness Tie the President to the Payment” [New York Times]. “When questioning one of the witnesses — Jeffrey S. McConney, Mr. Trump’s former corporate controller — prosecutors provided jurors with their first look at some of those records, including monthly invoices Mr. Cohen submitted to Mr. Trump’s company. The invoices claimed that Mr. Cohen was repaid for ‘legal expenses’ that arose from a ‘retainer agreement.’ But prosecutors say the purported expenses and retainer agreement were works of fiction. And although Mr. McConney testified that he did not know the true nature of the payments, he bolstered the prosecution’s contention that the records were fishy. When a prosecutor, Matthew Colangelo, asked Mr. McConney whether he ever saw a retainer agreement, he responded ‘I did not.’ And when asked if he sent the invoice to the company’s legal department — as was common at the Trump Organization — he offered a telling one-word acknowledgment: “No.’ Mr. McConney also told jurors that much of the money for Mr. Cohen had come from Mr. Trump’s personal bank account. The company sent nine of the checks to the White House for Mr. Trump to sign, Mr. McConney explained… Both phases of the case, the eye-catching sleaze and the stultifying records, are essential to proving the charges. New York law requires prosecutors to show that Mr. Trump falsified the records to conceal another crime, in this case, what the prosecution says was a conspiracy to influence the election by concealing potentially damaging stories from voters.” • In other words, campaigning? (I’m also dubious about the prosecution’s ability to prove intent; I remember one of those “Lunch with the FT” stories, where a reporter interviewed Trump. At the conclusion, Trump spoke with his staff (paraphrasing): “Make sure [the reporter’s] bill is covered.” The response (quoting): “It’s already taken care of, Mr. Trump.” So Trump’s staff handles a lot of things Trump doesn’t, er, need to know about. I mean, McConney didn’t write “fake business record” In the memo field of the check, right?)
Trump (R) (Bragg/Merchan): “Jury in Trump trial gets inside look into payments to Michael Cohen” [CBS]. “Two witnesses involved in the payments to Cohen told jurors on Monday about how they were handled internally. Jeffrey McConney, the longtime controller for the Trump Organization, recalled how the chief financial officer of the company directed him to pay Cohen in monthly installments, beginning in February 2017. At first, the checks were issued from a trust that was set up to manage Trump’s assets while he was in office. They eventually came from Trump’s personal account, a change that meant his signature was required. Deborah Tarasoff, an accountant at the Trump Organization, told jurors about how she handled invoices from Cohen and got the checks signed. ‘We would send them to the White House for him to sign,’ Tarasoff said, referring to Trump. The payments were documented in ledger entries.” • I don’t want to introduce a debater’s point here, but Trump personally signing the checks would seem to show he believed they were on the up-and-up. After all, surely there were a myriad of ways to launder the payments that didn’t involve Trump’s signature?
Trump (R) (Bragg/Merchan): “Being Held in Contempt Might Not Be Trump’s Biggest Problem” [Politico]. “If they were to do that with Trump’s broadsides since the trial began, the effect could be potent: The jurors would get to see just how inappropriately Trump has been acting outside the courtroom while he has been on trial — and while the jurors, whose lives have been upended and permanently changed by their participation in the case, have been trying to carry out their civic responsibility. In a bizarre twist of fate, however, Trump may have been saved by none other than Harvey Weinstein — or, more to the point, the recent decision from New York’s highest court that threw out Weinstein’s 2020 conviction on sex crimes. The court concluded that prosecutors in the Manhattan D.A.’s office had improperly introduced irrelevant and unduly prejudicial testimony about alleged sexual assaults by Weinstein that were distinct from those directly charged in the case. The jury has so far been shielded from Trump’s contempt proceedings. Particularly given the Weinstein ruling, prosecutors are now likely to be wary of a higher court later concluding that the judge inadvertently let the government back-door the contempt finding in this way when it otherwise would not have been admissible.” • This is the Molineux Rule again, but surely the strongest misuse of the rule would not be the Prosecution’s hypothetical introduction of Trump trashing the Blue jurisdiction jury, but actual witnesses presented?
Trump (R) (Bragg/Merchan): “This is 2024’s new political normal six months from the election” [CNN]. “But in dramatic testimony last week, former White House communications director Hope Hicks took the stand under a prosecution subpoena. In potentially the most significant moment of the trial so far, a nervous Hicks, who shed tears at one point, appeared to implicate Trump in a way that played into the prosecution argument when she said that the ex-president admitted to her that he knew his then-fixer Michael Cohen had paid Daniels. She also said that Trump felt it was better to deal with the story after the election than beforehand. But Trump’s lawyer, Emil Bove, extracted a statement under cross-examination that could be useful to bolstering the core defense argument when Hicks said her boss was worried about the Daniels story because it could hurt or embarrass members of his family.” • Hicks didn’t really give the Prosecution a whole lot (In particular, “better to deal with” doesn’t say the weight Trump put on the Daniel’s matter. It’s a paradox — I don’t love Trump, honestly, but the contradictions are making my head explode — that the liberal Democrat portrait of Trump is that he’s lawless and shameless, and indeed that’s his political persona; for at least segment of his base, that’s why they like him. So who cares what Story Daniels said? It’s just another lawless and shameless transgression. It’s entirely plausible to me that Trump cared more about the effect on Melania than the effect on his campaign, and in fact events proved him right. Trial of the Century, I know; perhaps I’m getting too deep in the weeds?
Biden (D): “President Biden trails former President Trump. Can he come back?” [William Galson, Brookings Institution]. “A comparison between these surveys indicates that the distribution of the white vote has remained fairly stable, in the aggregate and between those with and without college degrees. By contrast, major shifts away from Biden have occurred among Black, Hispanic, and Asian voters. Surprisingly, Trump appears to have gained more ground among college-educated Black and Hispanic voters than with less educated members of these groups. Equally surprising: Up to now, Trump has increased his support more among women than men. Whether this trend will survive a Democratic campaign heavily focused on abortion remains to be seen. Also significant is the erosion of support for Biden among voters ages 30 to 49. This is the cohort most focused on family formation and most likely to become first-time homeowners, suggesting that the surging costs of child care and monthly mortgage payments may be reducing their support for the president… The declining rate of inflation (disinflation) does nothing to lower the cost of food, gasoline, electricity, and housing. Americans are yearning for price decreases (deflation), which are unlikely to occur without a significant recession.” And then there are the swing states. Here is handy chart. Note the exception:
More: “While Trump leads on four of five top economic concerns, Biden has made an effective case for his efforts to contain health care costs by focusing on specifics such as insulin and prescription drugs. His challenge is to find equally compelling specifics in other economic arenas and to persuade voters that these efforts are making a difference in their lives.” It could be that Biden’s “junk fees” approach — and maybe even some trust-busting? — could help with the costs of everyday good and services. I doubt it, though. Last year, maybe, but now it’s too late.
Biden (D): “Biden’s quiet comeback may be over” [Douglas Schoen, the Hill]. “From February through mid-April, polls showed Biden, if still trailing Trump, trending in the right direction. In fact, there was a point in which Biden was leading Trump in 18 national polls during that time. Further, Biden was racking up a series of wins, including improving economic sentiment, a key metric the administration was desperately trying to move the needle on. In addition, the initial news fodder surrounding Trump, who had just begun spending most of his time in the courtroom rather than on the campaign trail, consumed the media’s attention. While Trump was stuck in court, Biden pulled in massive donations to pad his cash lead over his opponent. At one Radio City fundraiser where Biden was joined by former Presidents Bill Clinton and Barack Obama, the Biden campaign raised more than $25 million — a record. For the GOP, Republican infighting was — and still is — on full display in the House, damaging the credibility of the entire party. Yet, despite all this momentum, Biden’s surge appears to have stalled. fter a brief period where it looked like Biden had finally found his groove, his numbers are once again dropping while Trump’s rise, and that is surely a worrying sign for Democrats as November rapidly approaches.” • Could it be — hear me out — that the problem is the candidate?
Biden (D): “”We’re Not Selling Hysteria”: Inside the Cold Calculation and Unyielding Optimism of the Biden Brain Trust” [Vanity Fair]. Reads like an answer to last week’s Susie Wiles hagiography. Lots of nuts and bolts. In short form, the Biden campaign is very well funded and is systematically deploying its assets. B-i–i-g silence on how and often Biden will hit the campaign trail. For example: “[W]hen Biden visited a North Carolina home in March, Flaherty’s team enlisted the family’s 13-year-old son to post a video on TikTok, generating more than five million views across a range of sites, the kind of reach a conventional rally doesn’t produce.” Clever, but flip it over: The campaign clearly doesn’t want to let Biden out of his bubble. And the new buzzword: Relational organizing. “[Rob Flaherty’s] digital turf overlaps with his more experimental turf, relational organizing. ‘You have to get people to share content through their friends and family, trusted messengers,’ Flaherty says. ‘This is important because of what I think is the second trend that is different from ’20. In 2022, half of the content shared on Instagram was in private. So if you’re running a digital strategy that is aimed just at reaching people in their feeds, you’re missing where a lot of conversation on the internet is happening.’ Getting trusted friends to share political content, both digitally and face-to-face, could be extremely valuable. It is also difficult. Last fall, the Biden campaign launched pilot relational organizing programs in Arizona and Wisconsin, battleground states that went for Trump in 2016 and Biden in 2020 and are up for grabs again. The results of a pilot effort in North Milwaukee are one reason for optimism that the campaign can reach middle-class Black voters, whom polls have shown drifting to Trump. A veteran Democratic strategist is more skeptical. ‘It makes sense in theory,’ he says. ‘The problem is it’s all anecdotal. We don’t know enough yet to say it works. I mean, you have an entire voting population that gets their news from TikTok, right? Which is why most campaigns now, we just push all the buttons. We pay for more door-to-door canvassing, we pay more for texting, we pay more for phone banks, we pay more for digital. But no one—not Republicans, not Democrats—is confident anymore on what messaging works.’” • In other words, a dollar in Biden’s budget has a different value from a dollar in Trump’s; the absolute numbers are important, but not determinative. For example, Trump still gets a lot of earned media. What happens, for example, if Bragg does put Trump in jail? Nothing good for Biden, I’m sure.
Biden (D): “Biden voter registration meeting raises eyebrows on Capitol Hill: ‘Election interference’” [Washingon Examiner]. “GOP lawmakers are growing increasingly worried that an executive order issued by President Joe Biden in 2021, which mandated that federal agencies develop voter registration plans with “approved” outside groups, will be unlawfully weaponized this November to boost Democratic turnout. The Biden administration has framed the unprecedented operation as nonpartisan, though internal documents show the government hosted a July 2021 order planning call that appeared to serve overwhelmingly as a platform for left-wing organizations to suggest sweeping election policy changes…. The meeting notes reviewed by the Washington Examiner, which were obtained through separate records requests by the conservative Heritage Foundation’s Oversight Project and Foundation for Government Accountability, show attendees from activist groups discussed topics such as registering illegal immigrants and integrating voter registration into public housing as a requirement under federal law…. The 2021 meeting was virtual over the platform Zoom and attended by representatives from the Executive Office of the President and the Department of Justice, among other agencies, as well as staffers from groups such as the Soros-backed Open Society Policy Center, End Citizens United, and eBay founder Pierre Omidyar’s Democracy Fund.” • Why not allow the NGOs — of both parties — to spend as much as they like on voter registration, but on a randomly generated list of unregistered prospects? Watch the money dry up then….
Kennedy (I): “6 months out, a tight presidential race with battle between issues and attributes: POLL” [ABC]. “Kennedy gets 12% even though 77% of his supporters say they know “just some” or “hardly anything” about his positions on the issues. Notably, his supporters are more apt to be Republicans or GOP-leaning independents (54%) than Democrats and Democratic leaners (42%, a slight difference given sample sizes), and in a two-way race, they favor Trump over Biden by 13 points. That may explain why Trump attacked Kennedy as a stalking horse in social media posts last week.
“Behind the Curtain: 6% of six states” [Axios]. “Both campaigns are obsessed with six states — Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin. Those were the battlegrounds disputed by Donald Trump after the 2020 election. And they’re the ’24 toss-ups, as rated by The Cook Political Report with Amy Walter. A seventh state, North Carolina, is included in some swing-state polls. It’s rated “Lean R” by Cook. The other 43 states are either “solid” or “likely” for one of the parties. In our private conversations, Democrats are a lot more worried about November than Republicans are. Democrats say the race is winnable. Republicans think they’re winning. The swing-state map is a big reason why…. We perked up our ears when we heard a Biden insider use the ‘6% of six states’ formulation as a proxy for how narrow a group of voters are considered truly in play — swing voters in swing states. Republicans are making a similar calculation. A Trump insider told us that persuadable voters are below 10% in every battleground: ‘I think it’s probably 6% in Wisconsin but 8% in Michigan, and lower in Arizona.’… Trump needs to pick off one of the Midwestern Blue Wall states he lost in 2020 (Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania). Under current electoral-vote rules in Nebraska and Maine, if Biden holds the Blue Wall, he wins, Axios’ Alex Thompson notes. Many strategists in both parties believe Pennsylvania and its 19 electoral votes could wind up being the decisive state.” • Which is why, dear readers, I keep muttering about Pennsylvania.
“Money isn’t enough to smooth the path for Republican candidates hoping to retake the Senate” [Associated Press]. “Frustrated by the seemingly endless cash flowing to Democrats, Republicans aiming to retake the Senate have rallied around candidates with plenty of their own money. The goal is to neutralize Democrats’ roughly 2-to-1 financial advantage, among the few bright spots for a party defending twice as many Senate seats as Republicans this year. But it also risks elevating untested candidates who might not be prepared for the scrutiny often associated with fiercely contested Senate campaigns. In Pennsylvania and Wisconsin, GOP Senate candidates are being pressed on whether they live in the state. In Montana, the party’s Senate candidate recently admitted lying about the circumstances of a gunshot wound he sustained. And in Ohio, the Republican contender pitched himself as financially independent but now may be turning to donors for help repaying loans he made to his campaign. ‘One of the challenges they face, as opposed to established politicians, is that established politicians have already gone through the process,’ said David Winston, a Republican pollster and senior adviser to House Republicans.” • Electoral politics is, in fact, extremely hard to do at all levels: Electeds, operatives, strategists. It might be that one thing electoral reform advocates could focus on is making electoral politics easier; not sure how, but we could start by outlawing the air war, which is extremely expensive (since the First Amendment is a dead letter anyhow, eh?)
“What Went Wrong With the Third-Party Movement This Cycle?” [RealClearPolitics]. “After spending millions on ballot access, No Labels was unable to find a credible candidate willing to run under its banner and the Forward Party has shrunk into irrelevance. With an election cycle that began with so much hope and enthusiasm for upsetting the duopoly, what went wrong?… We have only had one successful third party in our country’s history. That was the founding of today’s Republican Party in the 1850s. At that time, the Democrat and Whig parties were the dominant parties. However, as the country grappled with the issue of slavery, both shirked from addressing the most important issue of that generation. So, a group of principled Americans decided to band together in a new political party that would take the issue head-on…. There are two important takeaways from this history for those longing for a moderate alternative. First and foremost, the Republican Party was organized around a political philosophy and a galvanizing issue, not the personality of a particular candidate. … Second, the Republican Party built itself from the ground up. It nominated candidates for state offices and for Congress before it had its first presidential nominee. … Both of these elements have been missing in subsequent third-party attempts and were in the failed attempts this year.”
Republican Funhouse
“The GOP’s deep generational split on immigration” [Axios]. “Young Republicans are notably more moderate on immigration than the elders in their party, according to an Axios Vibes survey by The Harris Poll…. Most Republicans in the older generation did not feel that media often portrays immigrants negatively or unfairly, while 63% of Gen Z said that it does… Republicans have largely moved the political and policy discussion around the border to the right, with lawmakers embracing once-fringe ideas such as involving the military. But the survey shows younger Republicans may not be fully bought in.” • I’m not sure it’s a voting issue for them, though.
“Noem defends telling story about killing dog in new book” [The Hill]. “Noem, considered among the finalists to be former President Trump’s running mate, has been embroiled in controversy since copies of her book, ‘No Going Back,’ became public.” • If Noem wrote that book to support her Veep ambitions, what does that say about her judgment?
“RNC chief counsel resigns after two months” [FOX]. “The Republican National Committee’s chief counsel Charlie Spies has resigned two months after accepting the position. Spies’ departure follows weeks of growing tension with RNC officials, a source familiar with the situation told CNN. His hiring rankled many Donald Trump loyalists who viewed the veteran Republican lawyer as at odds with the former president, given his previous work for Jeb Bush, Mitt Romney and Ron DeSantis.” • Maybe Spies didn’t get along with Lara Trump?
Pandemics
“I am in earnest — I will not equivocate — I will not excuse — I will not retreat a single inch — AND I WILL BE HEARD.” –William Lloyd Garrison
Covid Resources, United States (National): Transmission (CDC); Wastewater (CDC, Biobot; includes many counties; Wastewater Scan, includes drilldown by zip); Variants (CDC; Walgreens); “Iowa COVID-19 Tracker” (in IA, but national data). “Infection Control, Emergency Management, Safety, and General Thoughts” (especially on hospitalization by city).
Lambert here: Readers, thanks for the collective effort. To update any entry, do feel free to contact me at the address given with the plants. Please put “COVID” in the subject line. Thank you!
Resources, United States (Local): AK (dashboard); AL (dashboard); AR (dashboard); AZ (dashboard); CA (dashboard; Marin, dashboard; Stanford, wastewater; Oakland, wastewater); CO (dashboard; wastewater); CT (dashboard); DE (dashboard); FL (wastewater); GA (wastewater); HI (dashboard); IA (wastewater reports); ID (dashboard, Boise; dashboard, wastewater, Central Idaho; wastewater, Coeur d’Alene; dashboard, Spokane County); IL (wastewater); IN (dashboard); KS (dashboard; wastewater, Lawrence); KY (dashboard, Louisville); LA (dashboard); MA (wastewater); MD (dashboard); ME (dashboard); MI (wastewater; wastewater); MN (dashboard); MO (wastewater); MS (dashboard); MT (dashboard); NC (dashboard); ND (dashboard; wastewater); NE (dashboard); NH (wastewater); NJ (dashboard); NM (dashboard); NV (dashboard; wastewater, Southern NV); NY (dashboard); OH (dashboard); OK (dashboard); OR (dashboard); PA (dashboard); RI (dashboard); SC (dashboard); SD (dashboard); TN (dashboard); TX (dashboard); UT (wastewater); VA (dashboard); VT (dashboard); WA (dashboard; dashboard); WI (wastewater); WV (wastewater); WY (wastewater).
Resources, Canada (National): Wastewater (Government of Canada).
Resources, Canada (Provincial): ON (wastewater); QC (les eaux usées); BC (wastewater); BC, Vancouver (wastewater).
Hat tips to helpful readers: Alexis, anon (2), Art_DogCT, B24S, CanCyn, ChiGal, Chuck L, Festoonic, FM, FreeMarketApologist (4), Gumbo, hop2it, JB, JEHR, JF, JL Joe, John, JM (10), JustAnotherVolunteer, JW, KatieBird, LL, Michael King, KF, LaRuse, mrsyk, MT, MT_Wild, otisyves, Petal (6), RK (2), RL, RM, Rod, square coats (11), tennesseewaltzer, Tom B., Utah, Bob White (3).
Stay safe out there!
Maskstravaganza
If your premises are contradictory, you can reason to any conclusion:
⏩VERTLARTNIC DOUBLE FEATURE:
⚫️Masks Are Totally Ineffective And There’s Absolutely No Point Wearing Them.
⚫️Masks Are So Effective That They Stopped Us Catching Diseases in 2020, That’s Why We’re So Sick Now. pic.twitter.com/MF3xRS1WcH— The Vertlartnic (@TheVertlartnic) May 1, 2024
Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions
“The Unexpected Drop in Intimate Partner Violence” (press release) [University of Melbourne]. “During the COVID-19 pandemic, with lockdowns and other limits on social gatherings, many expressed concerns these restrictions would lead to the escalation of domestic and family violence… But as the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) releases the fourth wave of its Australian Personal Safety Survey (PSS) – a complex picture emerges complicated further by the COVID limitations on the research itself. The survey has found that, here in Australia, the number of women experiencing intimate partner violence dropped during the pandemic, but how does this compare with expectations of an increase in IPV during the pandemic?…. In 2021-2022 – while COVID lockdowns continued – there was a significant decrease in 12-month partner violence. It dropped from 2.3 per cent in the 12 months prior to the survey in 2016 to 1.5 per cent during 2021-2022. The patterns for cohabiting partners also showed a significant drop in physical violence and emotional violence from 2016 to 2021-2022. This overall pattern of decreased cohabiting violence also occurred in Victoria, Queensland and South Australia, while emotional violence decreased in the Australian Capital Territory. Rates were unchanged in New South Wales, Western Australia, Tasmania, and the Northern Territory.” Note that there are a lot of confounders, and the causality is not at all clear. However: “[I]t might be that there was some positive impact from the pandemic. Some families formed a solidarity or cohesive connectedness against the uncontrollable crisis of the pandemic – pulling them together rather than fragmenting apart.” • Hmm.
Celebrity Watch
Does 3M have a marketing department?
Violet Affleck walking outside with her mother, with a brand new respirator in hand, ready to put on when she enters a public indoor space
Clearly not anti-paparazzi move (as some have claimed), just well informed & well protected pic.twitter.com/PEBKlSpsK3
— Sue J (@SMpwrgr) May 7, 2024
I think that’s an Aura. 3M, masker to the stars! (I’m envisaged a compaign a lot like the “Got Milk?” campaign in days of yore, but for respirators.
Elite Maleficence
“Information processing style and institutional trust as factors of COVID vaccine hesitancy” [Nature]. “We find that individuals with pre-pandemic elevated anxiety and less effective information processing tended to see the vaccine as safe, while those with anxiety and more effective information processing viewed the vaccine as less safe. This result may reflect a tendency among individuals with elevated anxiety and high information processing capacities to retain the decision autonomy and at the same time, due to negativity bias, to be more sensitive to negative information about the vaccines. Elevated levels of paranoia did not modulate relations between drift rates and vaccination decisions. As in prior results it was associated with less positive perception of vaccine safety. This negative impact was fully mediated through reduced trust in the CDC. Paranoia has long been associated with difficulties developing trust that lead to pervasive interpersonal challenges. Our results extend this dynamic to institutions: lack of trust in public institutions may generate additional social challenges for these individuals. We find that superstition and authoritarian aggression were negatively related to self-reported perception of vaccine safety, while authoritarian submission may be linked to a tendency to relinquish the decision to an institutional authority.” • Hmm. So the “vax and relax” crowd were “authoritarian submissives”? What do readers think of this article?
TABLE 1: Daily Covid Charts
LEGEND
1) ★ for charts new today; all others are not updated.
2) For a full-size/full-resolution image, Command-click (MacOS) or right-click (Windows) on the chart thumbnail and “open image in new tab.”
NOTES
[1] (Biobot) Our curve has now flattened out at a level far above valleys under Trump. Not a great victory. Note also the area “under the curve,” besides looking at peaks. That area is larger under Biden than under Trump, and it seems to be rising steadily if unevenly.
[2] (Biobot) No backward revisons….
[3] (CDC Variants) KP.2 has entered the chat, at least in the model. Commentary:
What CDC projected last week was completely incorrect, not even close to what came to fruition, their forecasting ability is nonexistent, this entire narrative is #broken pic.twitter.com/E1p8yEIa3p
— Justin Lee (@DailyJLee) May 3, 2024
As I commented: “Surprise!” (Now I can’t find it, but I recall tracking a CDC model of infection at the national level because I knew it would fail, and it did, spectacularly, missing IIRC Omicron.)
[4] (ER) CDC seems to have killed this off, since the link is broken, I think in favor of this thing. I will try to confirm. UPDATE Yes, leave it to CDC to kill a page, and then announce it was archived a day later. And heaven forfend CDC should explain where to go to get equivalent data, if any. I liked the ER data, because it seemed really hard to game.
[5] (Hospitalization: NY) Flattening out to a non-zero baseline. I suppose to a tame epidemiologist it looks like “endemicity,” but to me it looks like another tranche of lethality.
[6] (Hospitalization: CDC) Still down. “Maps, charts, and data provided by CDC, updates weekly for the previous MMWR week (Sunday-Saturday) on Thursdays (Deaths, Emergency Department Visits, Test Positivity) and weekly the following Mondays (Hospitalizations) by 8 pm ET†”.
[7] (Walgreens) Slight uptick.
[8] (Cleveland) Leveling out.
[9] (Travelers: Posivitity) Flattens.
[10] (Travelers: Variants) JN.1 dominates utterly. Still no mention of KP.2
[11] Looks like the Times isn’t reporting death data any more? Maybe I need to go back to The Economist….
Stats Watch
Supply Chain: “United States LMI Logistics Managers Index” [Trading Economics]. “The Logistics Manager’s Index in the US increased to 58.3 in March 2024, from 56.5 in February, marking the fastest expansion since September 2022. This indicates that the overall logistics industry is experiencing healthy growth, albeit at the lower end. The growth is attributed to long-planned inventory expansions and improved efficiency in warehousing and transportation.” • Pennsylvania is a logistics hub, let us remember.
Retail: “United States Used Car Prices YoY” [Trading Economics]. “The Manheim Used Vehicle Value Index for the US decreased 14% year-on-year in April 2024, following a 14.7% slump in March which was the biggest decline since December 2022.”
Tech: “TikTok sues U.S. government, says ban violates First Amendment” [CNBC]. “TikTok is suing the United States government in an effort to stop enforcement of a bill passed last month that seeks to force the app’s Chinese owner to sell the app or have it banned. The lawsuit, filed Tuesday in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, argues that the bill, the Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act, violates constitutional protections of free speech. The suit calls the law an ‘unprecedented violation’ of the First Amendment. ‘For the first time in history, Congress has enacted a law that subjects a single, named speech platform to a permanent, nationwide ban,’ TikTok wrote in the lawsuit, ‘and bars every American from participating in a unique online community with more than 1 billion people worldwide.’ The company argues that invoking national security concerns is not a sufficient reason for restricting free speech, and that the burden is on the federal government to prove that this restriction is warranted. It has not met that burden, the lawsuit stated.” • I so don’t want to get another social media account, but if kids these days are getting all their news from TikTok, I might have to….
Manufacturing: “Some 787 Production Test Records Were Falsified, Boeing Says” [Aviation Week]. “Boeing must inspect undelivered and in-production 787s to ensure some steps in the aircraft’s assembly were done correctly after learning that required tests to validate the work were recorded as complete but never conducted…. Boeing ‘voluntarily informed us in April that it may not have completed required inspections to confirm adequate bonding and grounding where the wings join the fuselage on certain 787 Dreamliner airplanes,’ the agency said. ‘The FAA is investigating whether Boeing completed the inspections and whether company employees may have falsified aircraft records.’… The incident provides evidence that Boeing’s emphasis on spotlighting safety issues, even if they reflect poorly on the company, is paying dividends. It also underscores how far the company has to go, as falsification of safety-related records is arguably industry’s most egregious non-operational regulatory violation. ‘It brings the entire production certificate (PC) into question,’ said one former FAA official with extensive aircraft certification experience. ‘A PC is really an expression of trust. Considering all the [Boeing issues] bubbling up … the FAA may have no choice but to assume the falsification is widespread.’”
Manufacturing: “The surprise is not that Boeing lost commercial crew but that it finished at all” [Ars Technica]. “Boeing undoubtedly would like to have that decision back. In hindsight, it seems obvious that the strain of operating in a fixed-price environment was the fundamental cause of many of Boeing’s struggles with Starliner and similar government procurement programs—so much so that the company’s Defense, Space, & Security division is unlikely to participate in fixed-price competitions any longer. In 2023, the company’s chief executive said Boeing would ‘never do them again.’… There is a great irony in all of this. By bidding on commercial crew, Boeing helped launch the US commercial space industry. But in the coming years, its space division is likely to be swallowed by younger companies that can bid less, deliver more, and act more expeditiously. The surprise is not that Boeing lost to a more nimble competitor in the commercial space race. The surprise is that this lumbering company made it at all. For that, we should celebrate Starliner’s impending launch and the thousands of engineers and technicians who made it happen.” • Launch still “impending,” and I hope the crew survives.
Today’s Fear & Greed Index: 40 Fear (previous close: 39 Fear) [CNN]. One week ago: 43 (Fear). (0 is Extreme Fear; 100 is Extreme Greed). Last updated May 6 at 1:35:49 PM ET.
Health
“Science shows how a surge of anger could raise heart attack risk” [NBC]. N = 280. “The findings, published Wednesday in the Journal of the American Heart Association, show that anger may indeed affect the heart because of how it impairs blood vessel function. The researchers found blood vessels’ ability to dilate was significantly reduced among people in the angry group compared with those in the control group. Blood vessel dilation wasn’t affected in the sadness and anxiety groups. Dilation can be regulated by endothelial cells, which line the insides of blood vessels. By dilating and contracting, blood vessels slow down or increase the flow of blood to the parts of the body that need it. Further tests revealed that there was no damage to the endothelial cells or to the body’s ability to repair any endothelial cell damage. The only issue was the dilation, the study found.” • Hmm.
Class Warfare
“Rising Number of Men Don’t Want to Work” [Newsweek]. “American men are opting out of the workforce at unforeseen rates. For many, it’s not an issue of not being able to find a job. They have simply opted out altogether. The Bureau of Labor Statistics found only 89 percent of working age men have a job or are actively looking for work. In 1950, that number was at 97 percent…. ‘If the jobs don’t meet people’s needs, people can’t work,’ Yvonne Vissing, a professor at Salem State University and an expert on the changing role of men in society, told Newsweek. ‘It’s not that they won’t work. They can’t, given the job options, locations, tasks, hours, pay, and environments that are available.’… ‘Many jobs are simply not satisfying,’ Vissing said. ‘Working for others who get the benefit of our physical labor and intellectual property is not rewarding either emotionally or financially. People want to work doing jobs that matter to us. We want to use our creativity. We want to matter, and in many businesses, employees simply don’t get treated with the respect and support that we need and want. People walk away from them.’” • The Bearded One called this “alienation” in 1844: “[T]he worker’s activity [is] not his spontaneous activity. It belongs to another; it is the loss of his self.”
News of the Wired
“Not Lost in a Book” [Slate]. “Ask anyone who works with elementary-school children about the state of reading among their kids and you’ll get some dire reports. Sales of “middle-grade” books—the classification covering ages 8 through 12—were down 10 percent in the first three quarters of 2023, after falling 16 percent in 2022. It’s the only sector of the industry that’s underperforming compared to 2019. There hasn’t been a middle-grade phenomenon since Dav Pilkey’s Captain Underpants spinoff Dog Man hit the scene in 2016. New middle-grade titles are vanishing from Barnes and Noble shelves, agents and publishers say, due to a new corporate policy focusing on books the company can guarantee will be bestsellers. Most alarmingly, kids in third and fourth grade are beginning to stop reading for fun. It’s called the “Decline by 9,” and it’s reaching a crisis point for publishers and educators. According to research by the children’s publishers Scholastic, at age 8, 57 percent of kids say they read books for fun most days; at age 9, only 35 percent do. This trend started before the pandemic, experts say, but the pandemic accelerated things. “I don’t think it’s possible to overstate how disruptive the pandemic was on middle grade readers,” one industry analyst told Publishers Weekly. And everyone I talked to agreed that the sudden drop-off in reading for fun is happening at a crucial age—the very age when, according to publishing lore, lifetime readers are made.” • My knee-jerk response is that politically correct Mrs. Grundys took all the juice and gore out of the books. I could be wrong though!
Contact information for plants: Readers, feel free to contact me at lambert [UNDERSCORE] strether [DOT] corrente [AT] yahoo [DOT] com, to (a) find out how to send me a check if you are allergic to PayPal and (b) to find out how to send me images of plants. Vegetables are fine! Fungi, lichen, and coral are deemed to be honorary plants! If you want your handle to appear as a credit, please place it at the start of your mail in parentheses: (thus). Otherwise, I will anonymize by using your initials. See the previous Water Cooler (with plant) here. From SV:
SV writes: “Leonotis leonurus, also known as Lion’s Tail or Wild Dagga Is a member of the mint family of plants.
At Neighborhood Farms in the Western Cape, Summer 2024.”
Readers: Water Cooler is a standalone entity not covered by the annual NC fundraiser. So if you see a link you especially like, or an item you wouldn’t see anywhere else, please do not hesitate to express your appreciation in tangible form. Remember, a tip jar is for tipping! Regular positive feedback both makes me feel good and lets me know I’m on the right track with coverage. When I get no donations for three or four days I get worried. More tangibly, a constant trickle of donations helps me with expenses, and I factor in that trickle when setting fundraising goals:
Here is the screen that will appear, which I have helpfully annotated:
If you hate PayPal, you can email me at lambert [UNDERSCORE] strether [DOT] corrente [AT] yahoo [DOT] com, and I will give you directions on how to send a check. Thank you!