The 17-year-old who killed four students and injured seven others in a Michigan school shooting two years ago doesn’t want their bodies shown at an upcoming hearing.

Ethan Crumbley is also trying to stop prosecutors from showing security footage of the 2021 killing spree he carried out at Oxford High School, about 45 miles north of Detroit. His lawyer also wants to bar a video of him torturing a bird.

The prosecution intends to show all of it next week at a so-called Miller hearing, a mandatory procedure during which the judge will determine whether a life without parole sentence is appropriate for his crimes. Crumbley pleaded guilty to the murders last fall.

On November 30 2021, Crumbley left a boys bathroom at the school and opened fire with a 9-millimeter semi-automatic pistol, gunning down four classmates: Tate Myre, 16; Madisyn Baldwin, 17; Hana St. Juliana, 14; and Justin Shilling, 17. Seven others were injured in the hail of gunfire.

His case has drawn national attention not just because of the heinous nature of the massacre but because his parents are also facing involuntary manslaughter charges — the first parents in America charged in a mass shooting. 

James and Jennifer Crumbley gave him the gun he used as an early Christmas present. They were summoned to the school the morning of the shooting to discuss his disturbing behavior. He had been researching bullets online during class the day before and he drew a violent picture of guns, a bullet and blood. The Crumbleys said they would get him counseling but declined to take him home.

They have denied wrongdoing, maintaining they had no way of knowing their son would carry out a mass shooting, and that their son is solely responsible for the deaths, not them. Their effort to block the charges against them is pending before the Michigan Supreme Court.

Crumbley lawyer: Prosecutors want to shock court

In Ethan Crumbley’s case, his lawyer says the prosecution is going beyond what’s required to determine an appropriate sentence and is “determined to introduce graphic evidence of the crime itself.”

“The people intend to do this in a courtroom packed full of family members of victims, and the media,” Crumbley’s attorney, Paulette Michel Loftin wrote in a court filing this week, adding that it would be “needlessly prejudicial and inflammatory.” Loftin stressed that her client has already pleaded guilty to his crimes and does not dispute what the prosecution intends to show.