The fight over the Murdoch family trust has deepened old fault lines. Lachlan was convinced that his three oldest siblings, led by James, were plotting to overthrow him when their father dies. Elisabeth, who has historically seen herself as the family’s Switzerland, said that she felt “violated and forsaken” by her father’s plan to change the trust. “You’ve blown a hole in the family,” she told him. Rupert’s oldest child, Prudence, accused him of treating her and Elisabeth like “his assistants.” James’s representative to the family trust, his best friend, Jesse Angelo, called the plan “Orwellian” and compared it to the disenfranchisement of Black voters in the Jim Crow South.

The fight is also about money — and specifically about how much Lachlan will be willing to pay for his siblings’ shares of the trust. Without those shares, he could lose control of the companies. Both he and Rupert have approached Prudence, Elisabeth and James about buyouts in the past, but Lachlan has never been willing to offer them more than 60 percent of the market value of their shares.

For many years, the Murdoch succession battle was framed as a fight over which Murdoch child would control the empire after Rupert dies: the more conservative Lachlan or the more liberal James. But there’s another very real possibility: The Murdoch family may lose control altogether in a few years. Rupert has no one to blame but himself. In 2006, he created the trust that holds the voting shares for Fox Corporation and News Corp. But the trust expires in 2030, at which point its beneficiaries can sell their shares as they please, potentially realizing billions of dollars but releasing their hold on the businesses that their father built over the course of more than 70 years.

Rupert, who is 93, receded from public view many years ago. He never gives interviews to the press and rarely speaks publicly. Speculation has been rife: Is he still with it? The answer, definitively, is yes. The Nevada probate commissioner presiding over the family’s trust case, Edmund J. Gorman Jr., was impressed enough by Rupert’s mental acuity to compliment him for it — even as he ruled against him. In his final decision, Gorman wrote that Murdoch “showed himself at trial to be neither a victim of his infirmities nor lacking in mental vigor.” Rather, Gorman wrote, Murdoch testified with “appropriate recall and, at times, sharp wit.”

It’s no secret that “Succession” was inspired by the Murdoch family. But when it comes to the Murdochs, art hasn’t just imitated life; life has imitated art. When Elisabeth’s personal representative to the family trust, Mark Devereux, watched the episode in which the family patriarch, Logan Roy, dies unexpectedly, sending the fictional Roy family into chaos, he panicked. He called Elisabeth to tell her to watch the episode. She had already seen it twice and was very upset about it. Devereux wrote a memo for the Murdoch siblings — the “Succession” memo, he called it — intended to prevent a real-life repeat by encouraging them to consider a variety of difficult questions, including whether it would be possible to move Fox News to the center after Rupert’s death.