For Daniel Atonna, access to utilities is a personal matter. 

Atonna, who grew up in New York’s Hudson Valley, said his family couldn’t always afford to heat their home. On some nights, when the heat wasn’t running, he and his sister accompanied their mother to her overnight shifts at a nearby nursing home. The two would sleep in the facility’s lobby, ensuring they were able to stay warm. 

Now 24 years old, Atonna said his family’s experiences with privately owned power companies have, in part, inspired his work organizing for a different system in New York: Publicly owned and government-operated utilities.

“These private utilities are not up to the task,” Atonna said. “They can’t even maintain the current energy grid, let alone get us prepared for the future.”

Atonna is political coordinator of For The Many, a grassroots organization championing progressive causes across The Empire State. The first step toward a new statewide energy economy, he said, could be the Build Public Renewables Act. The legislation passed the state Senate in June, but the Assembly failed to take up a vote before the end of its latest session, leaving the bill in limbo.

The act, if signed into law, would expand the reach of the New York Power Authority, a state-owned utility that provides power to public buildings and schools. It would allow the utility to serve businesses and homes across the state, requiring an eventual transition to exclusively renewable energy sources and significant infrastructure investments.

The New York act is one of many efforts across the nation to implement publicly-owned sources of energy. Such utilities generate about 10% of the country’s electricity, according to the American Public Power Association, and supporters are looking to increase that percentage. 

GOING SOLAR:In ‘aggressive’ step toward clean energy, Hawaii is closing its only coal power plant

Activists are rallying in other states, too – including Illinois, Massachusetts and Michigan.

Organizers at municipal and state levels say the practice would eliminate the incentivization of profit that comes with privately-owned utilities, while also allowing customers to more easily hold companies accountable for their service.

Opponents, meanwhile, remain concerned about the costs of investments associated with a shift to public power, and many doubt whether such a model would fulfill its promises.