Lambert here:

We are in the process of revising the Naked Capitalism newsletter in the hopes that we can turn it into a real circulation builder, instead of simply a service to readers. To that end, we want to make it weekly or fortnightly, give it a more professional look, shorten and tighten up the prose, and (we hope) add graphics. We have an example newsletter to follow that we like: The Cradle. It looks like this:

Our problem is the graphics (and not the layout, or the type, or the black, white, and red color scheme). As you can see, for the graphics the Cradle has used a collage technique, layering together a number of photos. If we publish one newsletter a week with five items, that’s twenty collages a month, with proof cycles to match. That’s a big burden. Every two weeks is ten pieces, still big.

We could reduce the burden. One approach would be to create an inventory of generic and topical graphics, as opposed making custom graphics for each story. (The topics we use in Links might be a starting point.) We might also simplify the graphics and perhaps alter their size. So, for example, as opposed to creating, on demand, a large graphic of a Yemeni container port overlaid with a head, flags, and a dagger, we might have a generic image of boats on the Red Sea overlaid with a dagger, also using less vertical space. We could then take generic graphic out of inventory when we had a story under that topic. We woudd create the generic, topical inventory in bulk, and draw it down. This approach would greatly simplify the editorial cycle as well.

However, I have always been on the production side of the house, and so that solution is how I think. If you are an artist, you may have a completely different idea of the right approach (although your idea would also have to meet our deadlines). Another production-oriented solution would be AI, but every AI image I’ve ever seen has been uncanny and ugly. If you really have those prompts mastered, you could change our mind, though!

If you want to put forward a solution for our newsletter problem, please comment (and please put a working email address in your comment so we can get in touch with you; we don’t ever share them, and nobody can see them).

Thank you!

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
This entry was posted in Notices on by Lambert Strether.

About Lambert Strether

Readers, I have had a correspondent characterize my views as realistic cynical. Let me briefly explain them. I believe in universal programs that provide concrete material benefits, especially to the working class. Medicare for All is the prime example, but tuition-free college and a Post Office Bank also fall under this heading. So do a Jobs Guarantee and a Debt Jubilee. Clearly, neither liberal Democrats nor conservative Republicans can deliver on such programs, because the two are different flavors of neoliberalism (“Because markets”). I don’t much care about the “ism” that delivers the benefits, although whichever one does have to put common humanity first, as opposed to markets. Could be a second FDR saving capitalism, democratic socialism leashing and collaring it, or communism razing it. I don’t much care, as long as the benefits are delivered. To me, the key issue — and this is why Medicare for All is always first with me — is the tens of thousands of excess “deaths from despair,” as described by the Case-Deaton study, and other recent studies. That enormous body count makes Medicare for All, at the very least, a moral and strategic imperative. And that level of suffering and organic damage makes the concerns of identity politics — even the worthy fight to help the refugees Bush, Obama, and Clinton’s wars created — bright shiny objects by comparison. Hence my frustration with the news flow — currently in my view the swirling intersection of two, separate Shock Doctrine campaigns, one by the Administration, and the other by out-of-power liberals and their allies in the State and in the press — a news flow that constantly forces me to focus on matters that I regard as of secondary importance to the excess deaths. What kind of political economy is it that halts or even reverses the increases in life expectancy that civilized societies have achieved? I am also very hopeful that the continuing destruction of both party establishments will open the space for voices supporting programs similar to those I have listed; let’s call such voices “the left.” Volatility creates opportunity, especially if the Democrat establishment, which puts markets first and opposes all such programs, isn’t allowed to get back into the saddle. Eyes on the prize! I love the tactical level, and secretly love even the horse race, since I’ve been blogging about it daily for fourteen years, but everything I write has this perspective at the back of it.