Lambert here: Hard to see why “engineering” in “financial engineering” doesn’t have air quotes around it.

By Wolf Richter, editor of Wolf Street. Originally published at Wolf Street.

Boeing, which has booked net losses every year from 2019 on, totaling nearly $32 billion, and which has borrowed huge amounts of money over those years, bringing its short and long-term debt to $58 billion while gutting its stockholder equity, now a negative $23.6 billion, has been in dire need of lots of cash to burn, after it wasted and incinerated $64 billion in cash on share buybacks to pump up its shares.

The company’s infamous pivot from aircraft engineering to financial engineering to please Wall Street has turned into a devastating mess, including for shareholders. Wall Street loved it at the time, and the shares soared by 500% between 2013 and the peak in early 2019. But since then, shares plunged and have given up most of the gain, and are back where they’d first been 11 years ago.

So today, after days of rumors about a share offering, Boeing announced a huge stock offering that will undo some of the devastation that the share buybacks wreaked upon its balance sheet, and it will dilute the bejesus out of current shareholders.

It will sell 90 million common shares (about $14 billion at the current share price) and $5 billion of mandatory convertible preferred stock that will qualify as equity for credit rating purposes. So that’s about $19 billion. It also granted underwriters the option for an additional 13.5 million shares ($2.1 billion at the current price). And according to a term sheet seen by Reuters, it can increase the mandatory convertibles by $750 million.

All combined, it would increase the total equity raised to $22 billion.

The mandatory convertible preferred stock is being marketed to investors with a dividend of 6.0% to 6.5%, and a premium of 17.5% to 22.5% to the stock’s closing price on Friday of $155.01, for when they convert into common shares at or before the maturity date of Oct. 15, 2027, according to Reuters.

This offering brings in sorely needed equity capital that the company had so recklessly incinerated with share buybacks before 2019. And it would largely fill in the huge hole that is its negative equity of $23.6 billion.

If Boeing actually raises the entire $22 billion, it would undo about half of the devastation of its balance sheet wreaked by the $43-billion wave of share buybacks in 2013-2019. That wave of share buybacks caused shares to spike by 500% into early 2019, pushing them from $75 to $450.

Now they’re at around $153 at the moment, where they’d first been in February 2015, down about 66% from the peak, just a hair from qualifying for a pedestal in our pantheon of Imploded Stocks (data via YCharts).

The dilution of existing shareholders from the share offering is going to be significant: There are 618 million shares outstanding, and adding the 90 million shares being offered today would dilute existing holders by about 15%. That’s before the conversion of the mandatory convertibles and the option of 13.5 million additional shares granted to underwriters. So if and when Boeing is actually profitable again, the earnings per share will be diluted by at least 15%.

Boeing stopped the share buybacks in 2019 as its difficulties mounted after two of its misbegotten 737 Max 8 aircraft crashed. Instead of wasting and incinerating $43 billion on share buybacks in 2013 through 2019 and $20 billion in the decade before the Financial Crisis, for a total of $64 billion, the company should have developed a brand-new plane to replace the 737. It should have fired the financial engineers and hired some aircraft engineers (data via YCharts).

Boeing’s corporate credit rating is currently one notch above junk at Moody’s (Baa3), S&P (BBB-), and Fitch (BBB-). There were fears that the cash-flow problems, production and quality issues, the huge amount of debt, and the ongoing strike by 33,000 workers that shut down much of the production in September, would trigger a downgrade to junk (our cheat sheet for corporate credit ratings by ratings agency).

A junk credit rating would make it even more difficult and costly for Boeing to raise the funds it needs to cover its massive cash bleed and to pay off the $12 billion in debt that is coming due in 2025 and 2026.

With the equity raise as outlined today, the company will have some limited financial breathing room, and will likely avert a near-term down grade to junk, so one day at a time. But it won’t resolve the production and quality issues around its aircraft, its labor woes, and the decades of damage that financial engineers from the top down had done to the company.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
This entry was posted in Corporate governance, Credit markets, Guest Post, Technology and innovation on by Lambert Strether.

About Lambert Strether

Readers, I have had a correspondent characterize my views as realistic cynical. Let me briefly explain them. I believe in universal programs that provide concrete material benefits, especially to the working class. Medicare for All is the prime example, but tuition-free college and a Post Office Bank also fall under this heading. So do a Jobs Guarantee and a Debt Jubilee. Clearly, neither liberal Democrats nor conservative Republicans can deliver on such programs, because the two are different flavors of neoliberalism (“Because markets”). I don’t much care about the “ism” that delivers the benefits, although whichever one does have to put common humanity first, as opposed to markets. Could be a second FDR saving capitalism, democratic socialism leashing and collaring it, or communism razing it. I don’t much care, as long as the benefits are delivered. To me, the key issue — and this is why Medicare for All is always first with me — is the tens of thousands of excess “deaths from despair,” as described by the Case-Deaton study, and other recent studies. That enormous body count makes Medicare for All, at the very least, a moral and strategic imperative. And that level of suffering and organic damage makes the concerns of identity politics — even the worthy fight to help the refugees Bush, Obama, and Clinton’s wars created — bright shiny objects by comparison. Hence my frustration with the news flow — currently in my view the swirling intersection of two, separate Shock Doctrine campaigns, one by the Administration, and the other by out-of-power liberals and their allies in the State and in the press — a news flow that constantly forces me to focus on matters that I regard as of secondary importance to the excess deaths. What kind of political economy is it that halts or even reverses the increases in life expectancy that civilized societies have achieved? I am also very hopeful that the continuing destruction of both party establishments will open the space for voices supporting programs similar to those I have listed; let’s call such voices “the left.” Volatility creates opportunity, especially if the Democrat establishment, which puts markets first and opposes all such programs, isn’t allowed to get back into the saddle. Eyes on the prize! I love the tactical level, and secretly love even the horse race, since I’ve been blogging about it daily for fourteen years, but everything I write has this perspective at the back of it.