Yves here. Longstanding readers of this site will likely recognize the name Public Citizen. Founded by Ralph Nader, Public Citizen has regularly punched well above its weight, particularly in the trade arena. Its relentless investigation and activism on the workings of so-called free trade deals, particularly the secretive and corrupt workings of Investor-State Dispute Settlement arbitration panels, was instrumental and arguably key to Obama having failed to get the Trans-Pacific Partnership and its European sister, the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership, approved. So a critique like the one below from experts at the level of Public Citizen should carry a lot of weight….but probably won’t until the Trump-created wreckage starts piling up.
The discussion below focuses on the harm done by Trump’s extreme flip-flops, as well as his simpleminded radicalism. In a bit of synchronicity, DLG, Reality Czar weighted in by e-mail on the question of Trump’s lack of probity, or failing that, astute use of power:
Do you recall reading Capitalist Fools by the esteemed Nicholas Von Hoffman?
He calls much of this power-grabbing, errant, and unproductive behavior the Mad Ludwig Syndrome. These executives have been put at the top of strongly hierarchical organizations where they are told repeatedly that they are infallible — and it all goes into their pointy little heads, producing much much untoward behavior.
See this record at the Chicago Public Library:
https://chipublib.bibliocommons.com/v2/record/S126C500282/reviews
Trump entered the Mad Ludwig phase a while back. Note in the reviews how Von Hoffman recognized and critiqued the second generation — the bozos who took the family fortune and the assets built by the parents’ generation and made a mess of them. Von Hoffman spent much time on the Forbes family, which has been wigged out for some 100 years. Trump is second generation, also.
And I will add a great mystery: Where is Melania Trump when we need her?
Backstory from Schloss Neuschwanstein:
Ludwig II was possessed by the idea of a holy kingdom by the Grace of God. In reality he was a constitutional monarch, a head of state with rights and duties and little freedom of action. For this reason he built a fantasy world around him in which – far removed from reality – he could feel he was a real king. From 1875 on he lived at night and slept during the day.
Idealized designs by scene painters for a “New Hohenschwangau Castle” high above the tranquil Hohenschwangau of Ludwig II’s father, a “Byzantine Palace” and a copy of Versailles were already in existence by 1868. From the beginning, Ludwig’s fantasy world embraced several different epochs. The “New Castle” (subsequently Neuschwanstein), was based on Christian kingship in the Middle Ages, and the new Versailles, built from 1878 on the Herreninsel, recalls the baroque absolutism of the Bourbon King of France. Linderhof in the Graswangtal, built from 1869, imitates a variety of styles, with the help of the latest technology.
The latest technology was also used for the highly elaborate coaches and sleighs in which the king travelled at night, sometimes in historic costume….
The “ideal monarchical poetic solitude” which the king chose for himself was not in the long run compatible with his duties as a head of state. The new settings he was constantly devising for himself were equally beyond the private means of a king. Ludwig failed through his desire to anchor his illusions and dreams in reality.
From 1885 on foreign banks threatened to seize his property. The king’s refusal to react rationally led the government to declare him insane and depose him in 1886 – a procedure not provided for in the Bavarian constitution. Ludwig II was interned in Berg Palace. The next day he died in mysterious circumstances in Lake Starnberg, together with the psychiatrist who had certified him as insane.
By Jessica Corbett, staff writer at Common Dreams. Originally published at Common Dreams
“Trump’s ‘will he, won’t he’ tariff chaos is just one more con on working people.”
That’s what Melinda St. Louis, Global Trade Watch director at the watchdog group Public Citizen, said in a Wednesday statement after U.S. President Donald Trump announced a 90-pause for what he has called “reciprocal” tariffs, excluding China.
“He claimed that the so-called ‘reciprocal tariffs’ would protect American jobs, but these reckless tariffs were never designed to do that,” she said of Trump. “He just wants to wield threats as a schoolyard bully while giving his billionaire buddies sweetheart deals.”
St. Louis warned that “when he says he’s going to ‘negotiate,’ he means more harmful free trade agreements that double down on the failed trade model he claims to oppose and that force countries to gut public interest protections for the benefit of Big Tech, Big Pharma, and other corporate giants.”
“Who’s left out of his megalomaniacal game? The workers he claimed to support.”
“And he wants U.S. companies to beg for exemptions from his tariffs, as they did in his first term. This is all part of Trump’s authoritarianism and corruption, forcing countries and businesses to bend the knee just as he is doing with law firms and universities,” she stressed. “Who’s left out of his megalomaniacal game? The workers he claimed to support. All he has shown is that he’ll cave to Wall Street’s hand-wringing and prioritize his own power over real people’s plight.”
St. Louis wasn’t alone in continuing to blast Trump’s tactics around tariffs, which have led some economists to concludethat the president does not actually even understand how international trade works.
“It took a month to ‘negotiate a deal,’ but it only took one day for Trump to hit the brakes on his nonsensical new tax on autos from Canada and Mexico,” Senate Finance Committee Ranking Member Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) said in a Wednesday statement. “This endless flip-flopping and bluster is just further proof that Donald Trump has no economic strategy beyond slapping tariffs on our trading partners.”
“Instead of coming up with a real plan to get American workers a fair shake, he’s making the United States into an international joke and driving up prices for U.S. consumers,” he added. “If Republicans in Congress allow him to keep this up, Trump will keep yo-yoing on tariffs and using threats to pressure U.S. companies to stay in line instead of fighting back against this senseless economic war on American families.”
Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), a longtime critic of “disastrous unfettered free trade deals,” said in a lengthy statement that “targeted tariffs can be a powerful tool to stop corporations from outsourcing American jobs… But Trump’s chaotic across-the-board tariffs are not the way to do it.”
“What Trump is doing is unconstitutional. Trump has claimed supposed ’emergency’ powers to bypass Congress and impose unilateral tariffs on hundreds of countries… This is another step toward authoritarianism,” the senator asserted. “And let’s be clear about why Trump is doing all this: to give massive tax breaks to billionaires.”
“These tariffs will cost working families thousands of dollars a year, and Trump plans to use that revenue to help pay for a huge tax break for the richest people in America. That is what Trump and Republicans in Congress are working on right now: If they have their way on the tariffs and their huge tax bill, most Americans will see their taxes go up, while those on top will get a huge tax break,” he added. “Enough is enough. We need a coherent trade policy that puts working people first.”
Trying to make sense of today’s tariff news. There’s some big news, some small news, and some easy-to-misinterpret news. So let’s chat. pic.twitter.com/jeyTvJnn6g
— Justin Wolfers (@JustinWolfers) April 9, 2025
Despite warnings that the costs of his planned tariffs would be passed on to consumers, Trump unveiled the duties last week, causing stocks to plummet and fueling recession warnings and speculation that he’s tanking the economy on purpose.
Trump’s tariffs took effect at midnight Wednesday. By the early afternoon, the president declared a partial pause via his Truth Social platform. He said that more than 75 countries have reached out “to negotiate a solution.”
In clarifying comments to reporters on Wednesday, U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said that the 10% baseline tariffs will remain in effect, but higher duties targeting various nations are suspended. He also reiterated that the administration’s message is, “Do not retaliate, and you will be rewarded.”
The exception to the pause is China, which initially hit back by announcing 34% import duties on American goods last Friday. Faced with Trump’s 104% rate on Wednesday, China hiked that to 84% and imposed restrictions on 18 U.S. companies.
Trump wrote on social media Wednesday that “based on the lack of respect that China has shown to the World’s Markets, I am hereby raising the Tariff charged to China by the United States of America to 125%, effective immediately.”
The Chinese government issued a travel advisory on Wednesday, saying in a statement, “Recently, due to the deterioration of China-U.S. economic and trade relations and the domestic security situation in the United States, the Ministry of Culture and Tourism reminds Chinese tourists to fully assess the risks of traveling to the United States and be cautious.”
The Hill reported that during a Wednesday press briefing, Lin Jian, China’s Foreign Affairs spokesperson, said that “the U.S. is seeking hegemony in the name of reciprocity, sacrificing the legitimate interests of all countries to serve its own selfish interests, and prioritizing the U.S. over international rules. This is typical unilateralism, protectionism, and economic bullying.”
“The abuse of tariffs by the United States is tantamount to depriving countries, especially those in the Global South, of their right to development,” he added.
Before Trump announced the pause, the European Union was planning to respond to Trump’s steel tariffs with “levies of up to 25% on a sweeping list of U.S. products,” The Washington Postreported. “There was no immediate comment from the European Union, and it was unclear how Trump’s latest announcement might affect the E.U. countermeasures approved Wednesday.”
Someone could have made a lot of money if they knew the timing of Trump’s on-again, off-again tariffs. Just sayin. https://t.co/qR4dxQ80hZ
— Dean Baker (@DeanBaker13) April 9, 2025
Although stocks soared after Trump’s pause announcement, many experts remain skeptical and demanded transparency around the administration’s global trade talks.
“Absent transparency about what is being demanded, we could end up with the worst of all outcomes—a bunch of bad special interest deals, all of the economic damage caused by tariff uncertainty and no trade rebalancing, U.S. manufacturing capacity, or goods jobs,” said Lori Wallach, director of the Rethink Trade program at the American Economic Liberties Project, in a Wednesday statement.
“The Trump administration could be striking deals with dozens of countries, but absent transparency, the public will not know whether their interests or Trump’s billionaire Cabinet and friends on Wall Street or his family are being served,” she pointed out. “Deals must focus on addressing the mercantilist practices that some countries employ, which fuel the extreme global trade imbalances that have deindustrialized the United States and today deny the benefits of trade to numerous countries worldwide.”
Wallach emphasized that “the Trump administration must not use these talks to bully countries into gutting their online privacy and Big Tech anti-monopoly policies or undermining their food safety, health, or environmental laws.”
“The chaos of these whipsaw tariffs flip-flops is already causing economic chaos and losses, undermining confidence in America and our markets,” she added. “Cutting deals in secret only adds to that uncertainty and risks corruption, which won’t just hurt Trump’s stated goal of investment in U.S. manufacturing but the economy as a whole.”
While experts like Wallach call for transparency in the tariff process, many congressional Republicans are working to further empower Trump. Nearly all GOP members of the U.S House of Representatives voted Wednesday for a rule that blocks lawmakers’ ability to force a vote on repealing the president’s import duties for 90 days.