Readers, Friday was my final Water Cooler, and this is my last post at Naked Capitalism. Friday, I put up a couple of railroad songs, and you had a great time sharing more and more tunes on the same theme. So I thought it would be fun to do the same thing again, with a different mode of transport. Also, a post like this may serve as an amuse-bouche before the ginormous tasting menu of the coming week’s events.

For me, songs that features airplanes were pretty hard to find — perhaps the inherent reciprocation of trains makes them more suitable for popular rhythms — but I am sure you can do better in comments. At first I tried to be clever with the sequencing — Paper Planes should really be juxtaposed with Deportee — but then I just gave up and went with chronological. That reveals a strong bias toward the 60s and 70s, but I can’t help it if my generation had the best music!

Flying Home (Ella Fitzgerald, 1947). Lyrics.

[embedded content]

Come Fly with Me (Frank Sinatra, 1958). Lyrics.

[embedded content]

Night Flying (James Brown, 1961). Instrumental.

[embedded content]

Flight 505 (Rolling Stones, 1966). Lyrics.

[embedded content]

The Letter (The Box Tops, 1967). Lyrics.

[embedded content]

Back in the USSR (The Beatles, 1968). Lyrics.

[embedded content]

Coming Into Los Angeles (Arlo Guthrie, 1969). Lyrics.

[embedded content]

This Flight Tonight (Joni Mitchell, 1971). Lyrics.

[embedded content]

Promised Land (Elvis Presley, 1975). Lyrics.

[embedded content]

Mothership Connection (Parliament Funkadelic, 1976). Lyrics.

[embedded content]

Jet Plane (Sonya Spence, 1978). Lyrics.

[embedded content]

Deportee (Plane Wreck At Los Gatos) (The Highwaymen, 1985). Lyrics.

[embedded content]

Airportman (R.E.M., 1988). Lyrics.

[embedded content]

Paper Planes (M.I.A., 2007). Lyrics.

[embedded content]

Dallas (The Flatlanders, 2012). Lyrics.

[embedded content]

I feel that I have said farewell once, and I don’t care for performers who return to the stage again and again to milk the applause and collect more bouquets. With great appreciation for your careful reading and commentary over the many years, au revoir. Now let’s hear more airplane songs!

This entry was posted in Curiousities on by Lambert Strether.

About Lambert Strether

Readers, I have had a correspondent characterize my views as realistic cynical. Let me briefly explain them. I believe in universal programs that provide concrete material benefits, especially to the working class. Medicare for All is the prime example, but tuition-free college and a Post Office Bank also fall under this heading. So do a Jobs Guarantee and a Debt Jubilee. Clearly, neither liberal Democrats nor conservative Republicans can deliver on such programs, because the two are different flavors of neoliberalism (“Because markets”). I don’t much care about the “ism” that delivers the benefits, although whichever one does have to put common humanity first, as opposed to markets. Could be a second FDR saving capitalism, democratic socialism leashing and collaring it, or communism razing it. I don’t much care, as long as the benefits are delivered. To me, the key issue — and this is why Medicare for All is always first with me — is the tens of thousands of excess “deaths from despair,” as described by the Case-Deaton study, and other recent studies. That enormous body count makes Medicare for All, at the very least, a moral and strategic imperative. And that level of suffering and organic damage makes the concerns of identity politics — even the worthy fight to help the refugees Bush, Obama, and Clinton’s wars created — bright shiny objects by comparison. Hence my frustration with the news flow — currently in my view the swirling intersection of two, separate Shock Doctrine campaigns, one by the Administration, and the other by out-of-power liberals and their allies in the State and in the press — a news flow that constantly forces me to focus on matters that I regard as of secondary importance to the excess deaths. What kind of political economy is it that halts or even reverses the increases in life expectancy that civilized societies have achieved? I am also very hopeful that the continuing destruction of both party establishments will open the space for voices supporting programs similar to those I have listed; let’s call such voices “the left.” Volatility creates opportunity, especially if the Democrat establishment, which puts markets first and opposes all such programs, isn’t allowed to get back into the saddle. Eyes on the prize! I love the tactical level, and secretly love even the horse race, since I’ve been blogging about it daily for fourteen years, but everything I write has this perspective at the back of it.