By Lambert Strether of Corrente.

The list of New Year’s Resolutions is a hackneyed genre (Good Housekeeping, Parade, Pioneer Women, Country Living, Financial Times). Generally, they are quickly forgotten, and known to be so, leaving the motive for making them unclear. Apparently, for some definition of “new year,” humanity has been making New Year’s Resolutions, in one form or another, since the Babylonians.

This looks like a lazy post, but it’s actually not; I’ve been thinking about New Year’s Resolutions for some time. And since 2023 was such a pest of a year, it makes sense to see if 2024 can be improved, at all. These resolutions are all small-scale and personal; no “End World Hunger.” They are also precise and actionable (nothing like “Make time for family” or “Try Something New Each Month”). However, in the aggregate, I think they will strengthen me for the year to come. Hackneyed though the genre is, my own list is not that different from those linked to above (though I have not included any stock photos of carefully diverse yuppies doing worthy things about the home, for which I apologize). Here it is:

1) More snark.

2) Go easier on CDC and HICPAC, they’re doing their best.

3) Less doomscrolling.

4) More reading, especially serious books.

5) Don’t relax before sleeping by watching YouTube, the infinite scroll is a seductive time-sink. Keep a sleep diary.

6) No more snacks.

7) Maintain and if need be upgrade my Covid protocol.

8) Finish that novel. Then sell it.

9) Learn to be less prone to irritation and anger, whether about big things or small.

Focusing on #9 first: According to IDRlabs; Multi-Dimensional Anger Test — an online survey popular on TikTok — I am “22.2% more susceptible to anger MR SUBLIMINAL Dammit, only 22?! than the average person.” On the bright side, another cheesy online test gives this result: “Your score is 10: Minimal Clinical Anger Issues.” So there’s that! No matter the surveys, however, it’s what I feel that matters. I don’t want to be walking around with V-ed eyebrows and compressed lips (even if that’s how I look when I’m really focused at the computer, and given that I have a critic’s mind, and that’s the look of a critic). I don’t think anger is good for my vascular system, and I don’t think it’s good for the people around me; I don’t want to be the sort of person people think they have to walk quietly around. Or walk away from. Of course, I said “Learn.” I’m not sure how to achieve this, so I’ll have to study up. And be aware!

On #1-#7: These all seem achievable to me, although we shall see. My life is optimized for blogging (and avoiding Covid), I keep a not unrigid schedule to meet my deadlines, and have a clear picture of places I go and places I do not (basically, 3Cs spaces). These resolutions are further optimizations. For example, when I say #6 “No more snacks,” what I mean, operationally, is “Don’t go to the store immediately before Water Cooler and buy a snack, along with milk, to initiate the writing process.” (I will, however, continue to buy the milk.*) That is, there’s only that single context to change my behavior in; I don’t have to contend with a generalized urge to consume donuts or Tastykakes wherever encountered. As for doomscrolling and YouTube vs. books, I feel the need to rise above the newsflow and impose stronger frameworks upon it. Those frameworks are generally only available in a scholarly or at least journal context; they demand serious, sustained attention, they are ideas to be worked with, and I do think that over-consumption of social media blunts that skill. This is a time to become smarter, not stupider. Not an easy task, given this timeline!

On #8, the novel… I’m still buying green bananas, but I do feel an urge to round out my life with a genuine artistic work of some kind. Perhaps a year is overly ambitious. But maybe when I get rid of all that stupid doomscrolling, and discipline myself to write 500 words a day, say, I’ll be happy with the outcome.

But enough about me. Let’s talk about you! What, if any, are your New Year’s Resolutions?

NOTE * Every article I can find says that milk does not increase mucus production. All I can say, is that I need to keep Kleenex by my desk when I start drinking it. And getting rid of whatever that mucus carries along with it — PM2.5, viruses of all sorts — is good. So N = 1, here.

This entry was posted in Curiousities, Guest Post on by Lambert Strether.

About Lambert Strether

Readers, I have had a correspondent characterize my views as realistic cynical. Let me briefly explain them. I believe in universal programs that provide concrete material benefits, especially to the working class. Medicare for All is the prime example, but tuition-free college and a Post Office Bank also fall under this heading. So do a Jobs Guarantee and a Debt Jubilee. Clearly, neither liberal Democrats nor conservative Republicans can deliver on such programs, because the two are different flavors of neoliberalism (“Because markets”). I don’t much care about the “ism” that delivers the benefits, although whichever one does have to put common humanity first, as opposed to markets. Could be a second FDR saving capitalism, democratic socialism leashing and collaring it, or communism razing it. I don’t much care, as long as the benefits are delivered. To me, the key issue — and this is why Medicare for All is always first with me — is the tens of thousands of excess “deaths from despair,” as described by the Case-Deaton study, and other recent studies. That enormous body count makes Medicare for All, at the very least, a moral and strategic imperative. And that level of suffering and organic damage makes the concerns of identity politics — even the worthy fight to help the refugees Bush, Obama, and Clinton’s wars created — bright shiny objects by comparison. Hence my frustration with the news flow — currently in my view the swirling intersection of two, separate Shock Doctrine campaigns, one by the Administration, and the other by out-of-power liberals and their allies in the State and in the press — a news flow that constantly forces me to focus on matters that I regard as of secondary importance to the excess deaths. What kind of political economy is it that halts or even reverses the increases in life expectancy that civilized societies have achieved? I am also very hopeful that the continuing destruction of both party establishments will open the space for voices supporting programs similar to those I have listed; let’s call such voices “the left.” Volatility creates opportunity, especially if the Democrat establishment, which puts markets first and opposes all such programs, isn’t allowed to get back into the saddle. Eyes on the prize! I love the tactical level, and secretly love even the horse race, since I’ve been blogging about it daily for fourteen years, but everything I write has this perspective at the back of it.